Saturday, August 25, 2007

Console Gaming vs PC Gaming

I realized today just how little I used my PC for gaming anymore. I mean, I obviously have to use it for MMORPGs, but beyond that, the last thing I think I played on it was Oblivion. And I honestly can't recall the last upgrade I did. Probably switching up to a Radeon 9800 Pro a couple years ago. In a shocking turn of events, to me at least, I do way more of my video gaming on a console.

To put things in perspective, I've been playing console games since I got an Atari 2600 in 1980. Since then I've had a NES, Super Nintendo, Genesis, Nintendo 64, PlayStation, XBox, Gamecube, PlayStation 2, XBox 360, and a Wii. That's not even counting the handhelds I've owned.

I've also been playing games on a computer for a long time. I started with an Apple IIc back in the mid 80s, got a Commodore 128 just to play games on, and have had some form of PC since my first 386.

During all that time, the best games always came out on the computer. The console games were fun, but lacked the depth and scope of a computer game, for obvious reasons. Of course, there were exceptions, like how fighting games and platformers were always better on the console (except the original Prince of Persia), but the best games were on the PC. But now, consoles are pretty much little computers optimized for gaming. And the depth of PC games is no longer an issue with consoles.

Try Oblivion on the PC and then on the XBox 360 or even Playstation 3. Other than the fact that you can't download mods on a console, the games play the same. In fact, you could make a case for them playing better on a console. You need a pretty beefy PC to make Oblivion look great (not good, but great) and have to download several mods to optimize the experience for the PC. With the console, just put the CD in the tray and you're set.

Which brings me to the fact that I don't have to worry about drivers or patches for my console. Well, I guess there are patches, but those are auto-downloaded and have yet to cause more problems than they solve. Can't always say that for the PC.

Plus, I never have to upgrade my console. Sure, I may have to buy a new system every 4-5 years, but even still that's just the cost of a high-end video card for my PC.

The saddest thing to me, at least from a nostalgic point of view, is that I don't see the PC regaining its crown as king of gaming. The bright side is that the games are stellar all around, no matter the platform. The king is dead, long live the king.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

I totally agree with the author. Here in India, I had to spend about 125000 Indian rupees (thats about 2900 US $ ) to get myself a decent gaming rig with an 8800 (no no, no SLI) and a quad core intel processor and 2 gb ram etc. about 6 months back.
After spending that much dough I'm not going to be upgrading anytime soon in the next few years.

Looking back upon that decision, I think it would have worked out cheaper if I had just bought myself a PS3 and a few games and a nice 32 inch LCD.